Another busy month in the retirement village sector in NSW and across Australia. Even though we are NSW based what happens in other states can have an impact on us particularly if your village operator has villages in multi states.
Some November sector happenings are as follows:
Although the major regulatory overhaul commenced with the Retirement Villages Regulation 2025 (NSW) in September, several follow-on compliance requirements and implementation expectations have emerged during November.
Insurance challenges remain a dominant issue across the sector.
Heading into the festive season, November has seen increased activity in community wellbeing initiatives.
Your board and staff held its annual face-to-face meeting in Sydney in early November. This is the only time we gather in person; all other meetings are conducted via Zoom. We welcomed new board members Colin Long, Denise McGowen-Slee and Bernadette Jasper.
During the face-to-face meeting we planned the year ahead and allocated tasks to board members. Stay tuned for some exciting and innovative projects next year.
We have two vacancies on the board and would welcome expressions of interest from those with IT skills and website development or maintenance experience. If you are interested, please contact our Secretary Fran at: secretary@rvra.org.au.
This month’s Bulletin includes vital information on adding additional names to your lease, and news on the care system from the Retirement Living Council. We hope you find the articles informative.
Roger Pallant
RVRA President
It’s hard to believe the year has almost ended! Now is the time to wind down and enjoy the festivities both in your village and with friends and families.
The Board has been busy during October and November. We have continued to meet with representatives from the Property Council, the Retirement Living Council, Fair Trading, and Operators, and have been out and about at various engagements including the recent DCMI Summit in Brisbane, reported on in this months Bulletin.
There were 27 enquiries from members covering a total of 41 categories (some enquiries covered 2 or more call categories) during October. The largest number of calls categories were about Management (10), followed by Finance and Budgets (8), and Residents Committees (7).
Members can access Information Sheets dealing with these and many topics in the Members Only section of the website. The Information Sheets links are being updated to the new 2025 Regulation but are quite usable in the interim.
The second video in the “Finances in Retirement Villages” series, “Understanding ongoing costs while living in a Retirement Village” is ready for viewing and is posted on the website and the RVRA You Tube channel. It will be closely followed by video 3: “Understanding the costs of leaving a Retirement Village”.
We offer virtual village visits for those regional NSW villages where we cannot face-to-face visit to acquaint residents with the supporting role of the RVRA. If you wish your village to be included in the Village Visit schedule, virtual or face-to-face, please contact Cathy on 1300 787 213 (option 1) if you have not already done so.
The RVRA 2025 Budget and Asset Management Plan Survey Report is now available for review HERE
The Survey covered 553 respondents from 161 different villages from all over NSW and many commented on their village’s experiences with the 2025/26 Budget and Asset Management Plan, giving us much valued insights into the concerns of Retirement Village residents.
We thank our members for their participation on this annual survey. Data from the Survey will provide guidance for future RVRA discussions and submissions with various NSW bodies in relation to Retirement Village legislation.
The RVRA office will be closed from 1:00 pm Wednesday 24th December, opening again on Monday 5th January.
We have now released our second video in our series about the costs of moving into a retirement village.
This three-part finance series breaks the topic into bite-sized, practical videos so residents and committees can understand what to expect, compare options, and plan with confidence.
2025 was a year of consolidation and practical growth for the NSW RVRA Education Centre. It expanded resident‑led video content, published its Education Centre Report for 2025, and strengthened partnerships that increased reach across NSW retirement villages.
The Education Centre continued its mission to provide clear, resident‑led guidance on retirement village law and living, building on the Centre’s foundation of research and resource development and supported by the NSW Government. The RVRA’s broader organisational role as a volunteer association representing NSW village residents remained central to how the Centre prioritised topics and delivery systems.
Challenges in 2025 included translating complex legal and policy changes into accessible formats and ensuring access to digital content for less tech‑confident residents. The RVRA used its existing channels—monthly bulletins, the website, and social media—to promote Education Centre content, increasing visibility among members and prospective residents. The Centre’s resident‑authored approach and accessible formats helped maintain trust and relevance, particularly for older audiences who value clear, locally grounded advice.
Key achievements:
The Outreach program continued, including structured “village visit” formats by Zoom and in‑person where possible that brought Education Centre content directly into communities and supported local residents committees.
The Centre’s 2025 work established a clear content base designed by residents for residents and supported through partnerships with NSW agencies and sector stakeholders. The Education Centre enters 2026 positioned to convert 2025’s momentum into measurable impact. We expect continued growth in resident‑authored short videos and resource sheets, a strong webinar and village‑visit outreach mix, and a continuing emphasis on evaluation and regional access to close the digital divide. Diane Hart Chair, RVRA Education Centre
Adding an additional name to a retirement village lease in New South Wales can appear straightforward, but in practice it often raises a number of legal, administrative, and practical issues. These challenges highlight the importance of understanding the structure of retirement village contracts and ensuring all intended residents are correctly named on the lease before the agreement is executed.
One common question is whether a retirement village operator is presumed to consent to adding an additional resident’s name when no obvious impediment exists. Generally, there is no legal presumption that an operator must approve such a request. Retirement village leases—often structured as long-term licences, leases, or loan-licence arrangements—are governed by carefully drafted contracts that form part of a regulated statutory scheme under the Retirement Villages Act 1999 (NSW). Because of this, operators maintain strict control over who is named as a resident and party to the contract. Even if a second prospective resident meets all age, health, and suitability criteria, operators often retain absolute discretion to approve or deny the addition of a name. Their decision may take into account financial capacity, compliance with village policies, and the administrative burden of amending documents that have already commenced. Importantly, the operator’s consent must be obtained, and they are under no automatic obligation to grant it simply because no impediment is apparent to the incoming resident.
An important point to note is the need to ensure that at the time of signing, the lease unequivocally provides for the future addition to the lease, whilst the resident occupies the premises, of any person with whom the resident claims to have set up a “live-in” relationship.
Cost is another significant consideration. Where an operator allows the addition of a name, the work is normally carried out by the operator’s own solicitor. Residents should expect to pay reasonable legal and administrative costs, which typically include the solicitor’s time for amending the lease or residence contract, updating disclosure statements, and arranging execution of revised documents. In many cases this may also involve re-registration of documents, depending on the village’s contractual model. While costs vary from operator to operator, it is not uncommon for legal fees to fall within a few hundred to several thousand dollars, depending on complexity. Because the resident does not usually have the option to choose the solicitor, they also have limited control over fee structures or hourly rates.
These challenges reinforce a crucial lesson: prospective residents must take great care before signing any retirement village contract to ensure that all intended occupants are named on the lease from the outset. Including both partners—whether married, de facto, or otherwise—on the original contract offers significant protection. Most importantly, it ensures continuity of residence upon the death of one resident. If only one individual is named on the lease and that person dies, the surviving partner is not automatically entitled to remain in the unit. Their right to stay may depend entirely on the operator’s discretion, creating uncertainty and potential distress at a vulnerable time.
In summary, adding a name to an existing NSW retirement village lease can be procedurally complex, costly, and not guaranteed. Prospective residents should therefore ensure that all relevant names are included in the initial contract, safeguarding security of tenure and peace of mind for the future.
Len Mahemoff OAM
Board member
Nothing changes if nothing changes – and Australia is running out of time.
Our care system isn’t creaking anymore - it’s cracking. Throwing more money at it without reform is like slapping a band-aid on a broken bone. The system is coughing its way to collapse, and older Australians are paying the price.
Aged care facilities are jammed. Hospitals clog up behind them. Ambulances queue like dominoes waiting to fall. This isn’t a glitch – this is the system, and right now it’s doing more harm than good.
More than 240,000 older Australians are stuck in limbo, waiting to be assessed or receive services under the new Support at Home program. That’s a quarter of a million people. And with the over-75 population set to surge 85 per cent by 2040, today’s backlog will look like a warm-up act.
But here’s the good news - the solution is hiding in plain sight. Retirement communities.
Nearly 80 per cent of villages already provide care and support services. Half of new developments include co-located aged care. The infrastructure exists. The appetite exists. The evidence exists. The economies of scale exist to pool Support at Home funding.
So why are older Australians locked out of communities designed to keep them healthier, safer and more independent? Because some of our current policy settings belong in a museum. It’s policy paralysis at its finest.
With a few simple, rational tweaks – to Commonwealth Rent Assistance (CRA) and the Age Pension assets test – governments could unlock 60,000 homes for housing markets. That’s 60,000 family homes freed up for younger buyers while easing pressure on hospitals and aged care.
The scoreboard doesn’t lie:
Name another public policy that delivers outcomes this clean, this measurable, this fast. Few, if any, can.
If we want different results, we need different choices. Here are four no-brainer reforms:
Australia can keep doing what it’s always done and watch the crisis worsen. Or it can let the retirement living sector ease pressure on housing, hospitals and aged care simultaneously.
Nothing changes if nothing changes – and the longer governments wait, the worse this gets for everyone.
Reproduced with permission from Retirement Living Council – Retirement Living News
Further reading: https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/national/new-data-shows-community-living-boosts-wellness-in-later-life
We’re keen to hear from our readers, and from the New Year the Bulletin will include a new Letters to the Editor section.
If you’d like to share your views on matters relevant to retirement village living, please email your letter as a Microsoft Word attachment.
Guidelines:
• Maximum of 250 words
• Simple formatting only – bullet points are welcome
• Please avoid naming residents or operators
• Note if generative AI has been used
• No images, please

Help Us Keep Advocating for Fairness in Retirement Villages
Thank you for being a valued member of the Retirement Village Residents Association (RVRA) - or for considering membership. Our members' support has helped us continue advocating for fair treatment, stronger protections, and better representation for residents across New South Wales.
As you know, while most retirement village operators do the right thing, there are still many cases where residents are left vulnerable—facing unfair fees, poor communication, or inadequate dispute resolution.
With limited government resources and many competing priorities, retirement village concerns are often pushed to the side.
That’s why we are requesting your help.
A donation to the RVRA will directly support our work, including:
You can donate online (either direct through our website or using GiveNow) at:
👉 https://www.rvra.org.au/donate
Every donation—no matter the size—helps us remain independent, effective, and committed to protecting the rights of all residents.
Thank you again for being part of this important association. Together, we can ensure retirement villages remain places of safety, fairness, and respect.
On behalf of the RVRA Board - thank you for your support.
Kind regards
Roger Pallant
RVRA President
The RVRA appreciates the support of the following professional services organisations.
To become a Supporter of the RVRA, contact us.